U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Nabesna
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Nabesna limestone*
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Alaska Southern region
Publication:

Mendenhall, W.C., and Schrader, F.G., 1903, The mineral resources of the Mount Wrangell district, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 15, 71 p. [Available online from the USGS PubsWarehouse: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp15]


Summary:

[Presumably named for Nabesna River, Wrangell Mountains, southern AK]. Type not designated. Consists of generally thick-bedded, mostly white limestone and darker gray or bluish dolomitic limestone comprising a "series of limestones occurring on the upper Nabesna and Chisana rivers ... almost entirely restricted to the Wrangell Mountains". No age-diagnostic fossils found within unit; age regarded as Permian based on regional biostratigraphic correlations.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Nabesna limestone*
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
    • Biostratigraphic dating
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Alaska Southern region
Publication:

Moffit, F.H., 1943, Geology of the Nutzotin Mountains, Alaska, IN Mineral resources of Alaska, report on progress of investigations in 1940: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 933-B, p. B103-B199.


Summary:

Unit thickness at White Mountain is approximately 2000 ft. Age is considered to be Late Triassic [overall] based on occurrence of age-diagnostic fossils (including MONOTIS) from correlative limestones to the east in Snag Creek valley and nearby locales.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).