U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Kinter
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Kinter Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Named
    • Geochronologic dating
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Sandstone
    • Breccia
    • Tuff
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Basin-and-Range province
Publication:

Olmsted, F.H., Loeltz, O.J., and Irelan, Burdge, 1973, Geohydrology of the Yuma area, Arizona and California, IN Water resources of Lower Colorado River-Salton Sea area: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 486-H, p. H1-H227, (incl. geologic map, scale 1:24,000) [Available online from the USGS PubsWarehouse: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp486H]


Summary:

Pg. H33-H37. Kinter Formation. At type, divided into: (1) lower member, light-brown and greenish-gray coarse to fine breccia with tongues of sandstone and mudstone, 1,400 feet thick; and (2) upper member, gray, arkosic, pebbly, and tuffaceous sandstone, mudstone, tuff, and conglomerate, 2,180 feet thick. Total thickness at type 3,580 feet. Members can be traced northward into southern Laguna Mountains. Also exposed in narrow belt along south flank of Imperial Dam and in southwestern Chocolate Mountains, California. Data from subsurface wells show unit unconformably(?) underlies Bouse Formation. Overlies Tertiary volcanic rocks. Age is Miocene based on K-Ar age of 23 +/-2 Ma and stratigraphic evidence. Report includes geologic map of Yuma.
Type section: directly south of Wellton-Mohawk Canal, 1.7 km east to 1.3 km south of McPhaul Bridge, and about 11.2 km southeast of Laguna Dam, in secs. 3, 9, 10, and 11, T. 8 S., R. 21 W., Gila and Salt River Meridian, Yuma Co., AZ. Named from Southern Pacific RR siding at north end of Gila Mountains.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX); US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1520, p. 167).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Kinter Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Geochronologic dating
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Basin-and-Range province
Publication:

Marvin, R.F., and Dobson, S.W., 1979, U.S. Geological Survey radiometric ages; Compilation "B": Isochron/West, no. 26, p. 3-32.


Summary:

Pg. 6, geologic time scale (inside front cover). Kinter Formation. Sample from a 0.6- to 1.2-m-thick bed of pink bentonitic ash in lower part of upper member of Kinter Formation, in Laguna Mountains, in sec. 5, T. 8 S., R. 21 W., Lat. 32 deg. 45 min. 58 sec. N., Long. 114 deg. 26 min. 10 sec. W., Laguna Dam quadrangle, Yuma County, Arizona, yielded a K-Ar age of 24.2 +/-1.2 Ma (biotite); previously published age 23 Ma (Olmstead and others, 1973, USGS Prof. Paper 486-H). Sample from a tuff underlying the Kinter in same area, yielded a K-Ar age of 26.9 +/-1.0 Ma (biotite); previously published age 26.3 Ma (Olmstead and others, 1973). Published ages recalculated using decay constants of Steiger and Jager, 1977 (Earth Planet. Sci. Letters, v. 36, p. 359-362). [Oligocene, based on time scale of Berggren, 1972, Lethaia, v. 5, no. 2, p. 195-215.]

Source: Publication.


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Kinter Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Basin-and-Range province
Publication:

Smith, D.B., Tosdal, R.M., Pitkin, J.A., Kleinkopf, M.D., and Wood, R.H., II, 1989, Mineral resources of the Muggins Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Yuma County, Arizona, IN Mineral resources of wilderness study areas; southwestern and south-central Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1702-D, p. D1-D16.


Summary:

Kinter Formation. Unit age revised from Miocene --to-- late Oligocene(?) and early Miocene based on K-Ar ages of 24.3 +/-1.2 Ma and 22.5 +/-0.7 Ma (and early Miocene camel (bones) from unit).

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).