U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Slack Canyon
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Slack Canyon unit
  • Modifications:
    • [Informally named]
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Eastern Columbia basin
Publication:

Reidel, S.P., Tolan, T.L., Hooper, P.R., Beeson, M.H., Fecht, K.R., Bentley, R.D., and Anderson, J.L., 1989, The Grande Ronde Basalt, Columbia River Basalt Group; Stratigraphic description and correlations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, IN Reidel, S.P., and Hooper, P.R., eds., Volcanism and tectonism in the Columbia River flood-basalt province: Geological Society of America Special Paper, 239, p. 21-54.


Summary:

Pg. 23 (fig. 1), 38 (table 2), 43. Slack Canyon unit (informal) in Grande Ronde Basalt of Columbia River Basalt Group. Consists of 3+ flows; typically fine-grained, aphyric to rarely plagioclase microphyric, and dikytaxitic. Has normal magnetic polarity (in N2 magnetostratigraphic unit). Thickness up to 90+ m. Lies below and interfingers with Sentinel Bluffs unit (informal) in Grande Ronde Basalt; lies above Field Springs [Fields Spring] unit (informal) in Grande Ronde Basalt. Age is middle Miocene.
Named from Slack Canyon, adjacent to Moses Coulee, [in secs. 2, 3, and 11, T. 23 N., R. 23 E., Alstown and Palisades 7.5-min quadrangles, Douglas Co., central WA].
Reference locality: Douglas Creek-Slack Canyon, in sec. 11, T. 23 N., R. 23 E., Palisades 7.5-min quadrangle, [Douglas Co., central WA].
[Additional locality information from USGS historical topographic map collection TopoView; accessed September 15, 2013.]

Source: Publication.


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).