U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Skiatook formation
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Shale
    • Sandstone
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Chautauqua platform
Publication:

Ohern, D.W., 1910, The stratigraphy of the older Pennsylvanian rocks of northeastern Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University, Research Bulletin, no. 4, 40 p.


Summary:

Named as a formation in the southern area of the Sapulpa group; named for the town of Skiatook, Tulsa Co, OK on the Chautauqua platform. No type locality designated. Occupies a wide zone in northwest part of Tulsa Co; extends southwest across southeast part of Osage Nation to the Arkansas River. This zone is 5 mi wide on the north but widens rapidly southwestward. Consists of shale in the greater part of the formation--about 150 ft thick immediately above the Lenapah limestone (new). In upper part of Skiatook are seen heavy beds of sandstone which thicken enormously from north to south. A limestone lens is best exposed at Lost City on the south side of the Arkansas River 6 mi above Tulsa--reaches 40 ft thick at the quarry. In northwestern part of the Claremore quad, Skiatook is 250-300 ft thick; along Arkansas River, is not less than 500 ft thick. Overlies a bed of dense, massive, bluish limestone, the southern extension of the Lenapah limestone of Sapulpa group; underlies Ramona formation (new) of Sapulpa group. Stratigraphic chart. Of Pennsylvanian age.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Denver GNULEX).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).