U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Parashant tongue
  • Modifications:
    • Original reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Dolomite
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Plateau sedimentary province
Publication:

McKee, E.D., 1945, Stratigraphy and ecology of the Grand Canyon Cambrian, Part 1, IN McKee, E.D., and Resser, C.E., Cambrian history of the Grand Canyon region: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, no. 563, p. 1-168.


Summary:

"It is confusing, from McKee's text and fig. 1 whether the tongue is assigned to the Muav formation or to the Bright Angel shale" (GNC note, n.d.). Parashant tongue [of Muav formation of Tonto group] (USGS Bull. 1200); Parashant tongue [of Bright Angel shale of Tonto group] (USGS DDS-6).
Pg. 14 (fig. 1), 29, 98-99. Consists chiefly of fine- and uniform-grained dolomite which appears steely gray on fresh surfaces and weathers rusty brown. Usually contains much glauconitic and ferruginous material both as disseminated grains and in lenses. Strongly cross-laminated at Toroweap. Average thickness about 10 feet. Older than Boucher tongue (new); younger than Lava Falls tongue (new). Represents a time of sea transgression. [On p. 29 age stated to be Early and Middle Cambrian and on p. 184 (part 2) Middle Cambrian. Age is considered Early and(or) Middle Cambrian.] Report includes cross section, measured section.
A thin but persistent and conspicuous unit in Cambrian sequence of Grand Canyon, extending from vicinity of Granite Park eastward at least as far as Toroweap, [Coconino Co., northwestern AZ].

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 2924); supplemental information from GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX, Denver GNULEX), GNC index card files.


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).