U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Lomas
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Lomas Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Lava
    • Breccia
    • Sandstone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Seiders, V.M., 1971, Cretaceous and lower Tertiary stratigraphy of the Gurabo and El Yunque quadrangles, Puerto Rico, IN Contributions to stratigraphy, 1969: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1294-F, p. F1-F58.


Summary:

The Lomas Formation, here named, consists of a thick sequence of basaltic to andesitic lava and poorly sorted volcanic breccia and sandstone. Is restricted to fault block and is not observed in depositional contact with other formations. Age and correlation are uncertain; is Late Cretaceous. May be late Cenomanian based on Foraminifera.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Lomas Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Krushensky, R.K., 2001, Geologic map of Puerto Rico with correlation chart and map unit descriptions, IN Bawiec, W.J., and others, Geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineral ccurrences, and mineral resource assessment for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, OF-98-38, scale 1:100,000


Summary:

The Lomas Formation occurs in eastern Puerto Rico and consists of volcanic breccia, hyaloclastite breccia, conglomerate, volcanic sandstone, pillowed and non-pillowed lava flows, and rarely, volcanic lithic mudstone. Maximum thickness is 1500 meters. The Lomas is of Late(?) Cretaceous age.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).