U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Units: Jealousy
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Clay
    • Conglomerate
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Cederstrom, D.J., 1941, Notes on the physiography of St. Croix, Virgin Islands: American Journal of Science, v. 239, no. 8, p. 553-576.


Summary:

Probably named for Estate Jealousy [derivation not given]. Named for dark clays and associated conglomerates found in a test well; not known to crop out. Underlies Kingshill marl. Shown on map as a thin band of rock trending southwest to northeast, from Upper Loye to near Colquhoun in west-central St. Croix. Microfossils found in well cuttings indicate that upper part of formation is Oligocene.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
    • Age modified
    • Biostratigraphic dating
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Cederstrom, D.J., 1950, Geology and ground-water resources of St. Croix, Virgin Islands: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper, 1067, 117 p.


Summary:

Deeper well drilling revealed a thicker Tertiary section. A plain test hole near Bethlehem shows that Kingshill marl is underlain by a thicker Jealousy formation, which is a dark, clayey unit at least 1,398 ft thick; maximum thickness unknown. Section shows (ascending) 305 ft of dark clay with streaks of limestone, 5 ft of calcareous conglomerate, and 987 ft of greenish-gray clay. Near Jealousy Estate, formation is 368 ft thick; test drilling (well 39) shows 61 ft of hard calcareous conglomerate immediately above basement rocks (Mount Eagle volcanics). Calcareous conglomerate underlying Kingshill marl in stream beds near Jealousy is basal conglomerate of Jealousy formation. Foraminifera identified by T.W. Vaughan and F.G. Henbest indicate an Oligocene age. Cushman (1946) identified fossils in well cuttings of Jealousy and determined a late Oligocene age.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Whetten, J.T., 1966, Geology of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, IN Hess, H.H., ed., Caribbean geological investigations: Geological Society of America Memoir, 98, p. 177-239.


Summary:

Age of Jealousy Formation is late Oligocene, but may be older because bottom of formation has not been reached. Is shown on map as late Oligocene.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Khodely, K.M., and Meyerhoff, A.A., 1971, Paleogeography and geological history of Greater Antilles: Geological Society of America Memoir, 129, 199 p.


Summary:

Author questions much of Oligocene evidence in Caribbean. Age of Jealousy Formation is changed to late Oligocene and Miocene.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Gerhard, L.C., Frost, S.H., and Curth, P.J., 1978, Stratigraphy and depositional setting, Kingshill Limestone, Miocene, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 62, no. 3, p. 403-418. [Available online, with subscription, from AAPG archives: http://www.aapg.org/datasystems or http://search.datapages.com]


Summary:

Unit is entirely substrate. Conglomerates of detrital rocks cemented with carbonate mud are exposed along southern edge of Northside Range. They may be either Jealousy or Kingshill beach deposits. Highly weathered exposures show apparent conformity and gradational lithologies between the conglomerates and true Kingshill; therefore, exposed conglomerates are reassigned from Jealousy Formation to Kingshill Limestone.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
    • Biostratigraphic dating
Publication:

Lidz, B.H., 1984, Oldest (early Tertiary) subsurface carbonate rocks of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, revealed in a turbidite mudball: Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 14, no. 3, p. 213-227.


Summary:

Discusses possibility that forams show age of Jealousy to range from Eocene to Miocene, based on examination of a fossil-rich mudball. The mudball may represent part of the Jealousy Formation thought by Cedarstrom (1941, 1950) and Whetten (1966) to be Oligocene, but whose age remains less certain to others (Van den Bold, 1970).

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
    • Biostratigraphic dating
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
    • Biostratigraphic dating
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Lidz, B.H., 1988, Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) and Cenozoic stratigraphic sequence, northeast Caribbean, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 100, no. 2, p. 282-298.


Summary:

The Oligocene-Miocene boundary in borehole cuttings lies within Jealousy Formation based on assignment of Jealousy clays occurring immediately below Kingshill Limestone in boreholes M1 and M2 to the upper lower Miocene and mid-middle Miocene, respectively (Van den Bold, in Gill and Hubbard, 1986). Boundary position is also supported by assignment to the upper lower Miocene for a lens of green clay within Jealousy conglomerate from Northside Range; clay contained ostracodes that correlate with foraminiferal zones N7 or N8 (Van den Bold, 1970). Andreieff and others (1986) assign Jealousy conglomerate to same zones on basis of benthic and planktonic Foraminifera and the nannoflora. Latest deposition of Jealousy therefore occurred during late early Miocene and early middle Miocene and was contemporaneous with Kingshill deposition; the boundary between the two formations is time-transgressive, becoming younger to the north. The oldest fossils from Well 39 are late Oligocene, but base of formation must be much older based on unknown thickness of Jealousy Formation and Eocene through Miocene fossils in mudball described by Lidz (1984). According to Whetten (1966), there may be as much as 1.7 km (5,500 ft) of unexposed Tertiary sediment of unknown origin between Jealousy and underlying Judith Fancy Formations.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jealousy Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Alminas, H.V., Foord, E.E., and Tucker, R.E., 1994, Geochemistry, mineralogy, and geochronology of the U.S. Virgin Islands: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 2057, 36 p.


Summary:

Author follows usage of Whetten (1966) for the geologic units on St. Croix, VI. They include (ascending) the Late Cretaceous Mount Eagle Group, which consists of the Caledonia Formation, Allandale Formation, Cane Valley Formation (and its East End Member), and Judith Fancy Formation; Late Cretaceous Southgate Diorite and Fountain Gabbro intrusions; and Tertiary Jealousy Formation (early Eocene to middle Miocene) and Kingshill Marl (late Miocene, based on Gill, 1990).

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).