U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jacksonboro limestone*
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • South Georgia sedimentary province
Publication:

Dall, W.H., and Harris, G.D., 1892, Correlation papers; Neocene: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 84, 349 p.


Summary:

Jacksonboro limestone is a stratum of limestone containing numerous casts of shells and occasionally a silicified specimen, on the whole not unlike Tampa limestone. This stone was formerly burned for lime. The section near the confluence of Brier Creek and Beaver Dam Creek shows 5 ft of ferruginous sand and over 12 ft of compact marly rock with fossils. At present the presumption is obviously in favor of an early Miocene age for this deposit.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jacksonboro limestone*
  • Modifications:
    • Areal extent
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • South Georgia sedimentary province
Publication:

Dall, W.H., 1903, Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, etc.: Wagner Free Institute of Science Transactions, v. 3, pt. 6, p. 1219-1654.


Summary:

Pg. 1573. Author has no reasonable doubt that the horizon of Jacksonboro white limestone is practically that of the Tampa limestone.
[GNC remark (ca. 1936, US geologic names lexicon, USGS Bull. 896, p. 1036): Later studies of T.W. Vaughan and C.W. Cooke showed this limestone to be a bed in Tampa limestone.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 1036).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).