The National Geologic Map Database is migrating to a new infrastructure. We apologize for any service disruptions during this process.

U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jacksonboro limestone*
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • South Georgia sedimentary province
Publication:

Dall, W.H., and Harris, G.D., 1892, Correlation papers; Neocene: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 84, 349 p.


Summary:

Jacksonboro limestone is a stratum of limestone containing numerous casts of shells and occasionally a silicified specimen, on the whole not unlike Tampa limestone. This stone was formerly burned for lime. The section near the confluence of Brier Creek and Beaver Dam Creek shows 5 ft of ferruginous sand and over 12 ft of compact marly rock with fossils. At present the presumption is obviously in favor of an early Miocene age for this deposit.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Jacksonboro limestone*
  • Modifications:
    • Areal extent
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • South Georgia sedimentary province
Publication:

Dall, W.H., 1903, Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida, etc.: Wagner Free Institute of Science Transactions, v. 3, pt. 6, p. 1219-1654.


Summary:

Pg. 1573. Author has no reasonable doubt that the horizon of Jacksonboro white limestone is practically that of the Tampa limestone.
[GNC remark (ca. 1936, US geologic names lexicon, USGS Bull. 896, p. 1036): Later studies of T.W. Vaughan and C.W. Cooke showed this limestone to be a bed in Tampa limestone.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 1036).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).