U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Inola
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Inola limestone
  • Modifications:
    • Original reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Chautauqua platform
Publication:

Lowman, S.W., 1932, Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian stratigraphy of Oklahoma east of the Meridian and north of the Arbuckle Mountains: Tulsa Geological Society Digest, v. 1, [p. 33-36]., Summaries and abstracts of technical papers presented before the Tulsa Geological Society 1932, unpaged; paper dated Dec. 19, 1932


Summary:

[Pg. 34.] Inola limestone. A limestone in lower part of Boggy shale, occurring in black shale interval between salt sand or Enterprise [Bluejacket] sandstone of Okmulgee underground and upper Earlsboro or Red Fork sand of Seminole underground.
Named from an outlier on a hill to the east of the town of Inola, [Rogers Co.], northeastern OK.
[Inola Hill, in sec. 10, T. 19 N., R. 17 E., approx. Lat. 36 deg. 08 min. 43 sec. N., Long. 95 deg. 29 min. 17 sec. W., Inola 7.5-min quadrangle, Rogers Co., OK (USGS GNIS database and ACME Mapper 2.0, accessed November 9, 2010).]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 1014).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Inola limestone member*
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Chautauqua platform
Publication:

Wilson, C.W., Jr., 1935, Age and correlation of Pennsylvanian surface formations, and of oil and gas sands of Muskogee County, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 19, no. 4, p. 503-520. [Available online, with subscription, from AAPG archives: http://www.aapg.org/datasystems or http://search.datapages.com]


Summary:

Pg. 503-520. Inola limestone member of Boggy shale. Treated this limestone as a member of Boggy shale; gave its thickness as 0 to 10 inches; and showed that it lies 80 to 150 feet below Taft sandstone member, 40+/- feet above Bluejacket sandstone member, and 10 feet above Crekola sandstone member. Fossiliferous. Age is Pennsylvanian. Report includes geologic map, columnar sections, measured sections.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 1014); supplemental information from GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Denver GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Inola limestone member*
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
    • Biostratigraphic dating
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Chautauqua platform
Publication:

Alexander, R.D., 1954, Desmoinesian fusulinids of northeastern Oklahoma: Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular, no. 31, 67 p.


Summary:

Pg. 12, 16 (fig. 2). Inola limestone member of Boggy formation of Krebs group. Immediately above Bluejacket sandstone member is sequence of four cyclical units, each containing zone of marine fossils. Cap rock limestone of lowest of these cycles contains abundant fusulinids. Name Inola here restricted to lowest limestone, the only one that yields fusulinids (collections from western Mayes County, northeastern Oklahoma). Fusulinids reported from Inola at type locality, Inola Mound (citing Charles Ryniker, 1953, pers. commun.). Age is Middle Pennsylvanian (Desmoinesian). (Krebs group of M.C. Oakes, 1953, AAPG Bull., v. 37, p. 1523.)

Source: Publication; US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 1870-1871).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Inola coal cycle
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Chautauqua platform
Publication:

Branson, C.C., 1954, Field conference on Desmoinesian rocks of northeastern Oklahoma: Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook, May 14-15, 1954, no. 2, 41 p., Published in cooperation with Oklahoma City Geol. Soc


Summary:

Pg. 6; [see also "Outline of Desmoinesian stratigraphy," Oklahoma Geol. Survey Circ., no. 31, 1954, p. 8-10]. Referred to as Inola coal cycle.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 1870-1871).


Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).