U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Illipah
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Illipah formation
  • Modifications:
    • Areal extent
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Sandstone
    • Conglomerate
    • Shale
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Christiansen, F.W., 1951, A summary of the structural history of the Great Basin province in Utah and eastern Nevada, IN Stokes, W.L., ed., Geology of the Canyon, House, and Confusion Ranges, Millard County, Utah: Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, Guidebook to the geology of Utah, no. 6, p. 68-80.


Summary:

Pg. 76. Mentioned in summary of structural history of Great Basin province in Utah and eastern Nevada. Referred to as tongues of sandstone and conglomerate that lense eastward into dark-gray marine shales. Age is Late Mississippian.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 1858-1859).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Illipah formation
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Bissell, H.J., 1960, Eastern Great Basin Permo-Pennsylvanian strata; preliminary statement: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 44, no. 8, p. 1424-1435. [Available online, with subscription, from AAPG archives: http://www.aapg.org/datasystems or http://search.datapages.com]


Summary:

Pg. 1427 (fig. 3), 1433 (fig. 9), 1434-1435 (fig. 10). Illipah formation. As shown on correlation chart and diagrams, the Illipah underlies Ely, Callville, and Bird Spring formations and overlies Chainman, Rogers Spring, and Monte Cristo formations.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 1858-1859).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Illipah formation
  • Modifications:
    • Not used
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Sadlick, Walter, 1960, Some preliminary aspects of Chainman stratigraphy, IN Boettcher, J.W., and Sloan, W.W., Jr., eds., Guidebook to the geology of east-central Nevada: Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, Guidebook for the Annual Field Conference, no. 11, p. 81-90.


Summary:

Pg. 81-82, 83 (fig. 1), 84. Discussion of aspects of Chainman formation. The Chainman is recognized as a valid stratigraphic unit. Rather than formally recognize Diamond Peak and Scotty Wash as distinct units, the writer [Sadlick] prefers to refer to these as facies within the Chainman. Term Illipah (Christiansen, 1951) is suppressed as synonomous with Diamond Peak, and term should not be used for limestone sequence in upper part of Chainman.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 1858-1859).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Illipah formation
  • Modifications:
    • Not used
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Steele, Grant, 1960, Pennsylvanian-Permian stratigraphy of east-central Nevada and adjacent Utah, IN Boettcher, J.W., and Sloan, W.W., Jr., eds., Guidebook to the geology of east-central Nevada: Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, Guidebook for the Annual Field Conference, no. 11, p. 91-113.


Summary:

Pg. 99. Scotty Wash quartzite of Pioche district and Illipah sandstone of Hamilton district are same lithogenetic units. Scotty Wash quartzite has priority; recommended that name Illipah be abandoned.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 1858-1859).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).