U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Hans Lollik Formation
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Andesite
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Donnelly, T.W., 1966, Geology of St. Thomas and St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, IN Hess, H.H., ed., Caribbean geological investigations: Geological Society of America Memoir, 98, p. 85-176.


Summary:

Hans Lollik Formation consists of waterlaid augite andesite pyroclastic rocks (bears strong resemblance to Louisenhoj Formation). Was called Hans Lollik augite andesite breccia member of Tortola Formation by Helsely (1960; Ph.D. thesis). Makes up the entire area of Hans Lollik and Little Hans Lollik Islands, where excellent although inaccessible and hazardous exposures occur on west sides of both islands. Only inferior exposures on eastern sides were examined. Thickness is at least 10,000 feet. Formation is moderately thermally metamorphosed, thus structure and mineralogy were difficult to determine. Age is Late Cretaceous.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Hans Lollik Formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Caribbean region
Publication:

Alminas, H.V., Foord, E.E., and Tucker, R.E., 1994, Geochemistry, mineralogy, and geochronology of the U.S. Virgin Islands: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 2057, 36 p.


Summary:

Author follows usage of Donnelly (1959, 1966) for the rocks on St. Thomas and St. John, VI. They include (ascending) the Early Cretaceous Water Island Formation and the Late Cretaceous Louisenhoj Formation, Outer Brass Limestone, Tutu Formation (with its informal Coki Point Megabreccia lithofacies and Congo Cay Limestone Member of Donnelly, 1959), and Hans Lollik Formation. Five felsic rocks from Water Island Formation, dated by Michael Diggles (U.S. Geological Survey) using K-Ar whole rock techniques, yielded a range from 65.8+/-2.9 to 30.9+/-0.3 Ma. Two rocks from Louisenhoj Formation also were dated using K-Ar techniques by Diggles and yielded a range from 42.1+/-0.6 to 37.7+/-1.1 Ma.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).