U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Cedarville limestone
  • Modifications:
    • Named
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Orton, Edward, 1871, The geology of Highland County, IN Report of progress in 1870: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Progress, 2nd series, p. 253-310.


Summary:

Named for Cedarville, Greene Co., southwestern OH. Forms top of Niagara group in Highland Co., and northward in southwestern OH, except near Hillsboro and at a few other places where overlain by Hillsboro sandstone. Consists of a series of magnesian limestones, 10 to 90 ft thick, containing abundant large and noticeable fossils, most prominently PENTAMERUS OBLONGUS and MEGALOMUS CANADENSIS; also includes series of very thin-bedded and fragile limestones in which PENTAMERUS rarely occurs but which is largely composed of fossil remains and other shells. Underlain by Blue Cliff or Springfield limestone.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Cedarville formation
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Busch, D.A., 1939, Stratigraphic revision of the upper Niagaran dolomites of west-central Ohio and adjacent northern Indiana [abs.]: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 50, no. 12, pt. 2, p. 1976.


Summary:

Stratigraphically expanded below to include 43 ft of dolomite formerly included in the Huntington dolomite, as exposed at Ridgeville, Randolph Co., IN. As redefined, total thickness of Cedarville formation is 95 ft.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Cedarville dolomite
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Swartz, C.K. (chairman), 1942, Correlation of the Silurian formations of North America; [Chart No. 3]: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 53, no. 4, p. 533-538.


Summary:

Chart 3. Cedarville dolomite of Durbin group. Shown on correlation chart as uppermost unit in Durbin group. Underlies Peebles dolomite. [Age is Middle Silurian.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 693-694).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Cedarville dolomite*
  • Modifications:
    • Areal extent
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Kirk, Edwin, 1946, Stiptocrinus, a new camerate crinoid genus from the Silurian: Washington Academy of Sciences Journal, v. 36, no. 2, p. 33-36.


Summary:

Referred to as Cedarville dolomite, replacing Cedarville limestone, and noted as occurring in IN. Age is Silurian.

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Cedarville dolomite
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Bernhagen, R.J., 1960, Geology of the Yellow Springs region; Guide to [the] annual field conference: Ohio Academy of Science, Section of Geology Guidebook, v. 35, p. 13.


Summary:

Silurian section in Yellow Springs region shows Cedarville dolomite as much as 50 ft thick, above Springfield dolomite. Top of section. Age is Silurian (Niagaran).

Source: GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).