The National Geologic Map Database is migrating to a new infrastructure. We apologize for any service disruptions during this process.

U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Brookfield diorite
  • Modifications:
    • Original reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Diorite
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • New England province
Publication:

Gregory, H.E., 1906, The crystalline rocks, Chapter II, IN Rice, W.N., and Gregory, H.E., Manual of the geology of Connecticut: Connecticut Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin, no. 6, p. 39-155.


Summary:

Pg. 107 and map. Brookfield diorite. Extends from near New Milford southward to Bookfield Center, with length of about 8 miles and width of 1 mile. Is usually massive, but shows also gneissoid and even schistose phases. Both light and dark types are present in formation. Intrudes Poughquag quartzite [Lower Cambrian] and the schists of the region [Berkshire and Hoosac, of Ordovician age].

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 273).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Brookfield diorite
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • New England province
Publication:

Agar, W.M., 1934, The granites and related intrusives of western Connecticut: American Journal of Science, 5th series, v. 27, no. 161, p. 354-373.


Summary:

Brookfield diorite is older than Thomaston granite and appears to be younger than Bristol quartz diorite, Hartland schist, and Becket granite gneiss.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 273).


For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).