U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Bingham
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bingham quartzite*
  • Modifications:
    • Original reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Quartzite
    • Sandstone
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Keith, Arthur, 1905, Areal geology of the Bingham district, Part I, IN Boutwell, J.M., Economic geology of the Bingham mining district, Utah, with a section on areal geology by Arthur Keith and an introduction on general geology by Samuel Franklin Emmons: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 38, p. 29-70. [Available online from the USGS PubsWarehouse: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp38]


Summary:

Pg. 33-37, map, section. Bingham quartzite. Present in Bingham district, north-central Utah. Chiefly fine-grained quartzites and sandstones, more or less silicified. Mostly white and frequently vitreous. In lower portions of the quartzite, especially below the Jordan limestone, a slight banding is seen in many places, also cross-bedding. In upper part of formation, particularly above Highland Boy limestone, are many layers of ripple-marked argillaceous and slightly calcareous sandstones. In places very thin layers of fine-grained quartz conglomerate occur. Thickness exposed in Bingham district probably 8,000 to 10,000 feet, but neither top nor bottom of formation appears in this district. Is interbedded with many limestone masses, the Tilden limestone lentil, 100 feet; Yampa limestone lentil, 0 to 400 feet; Highland Bay limestone member, 0 to 400 feet; Commercial limestone member, 0 to 200 feet; Jordan limestone member, 20 to 800 feet; Lenox limestone member, 200 feet; Butterfield limestone member, 300 feet. Age of Bingham is Pennsylvanian.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 189-190).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bingham quartzite*
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Butler, B.S., Calkins, F.C., Loughlin, G.F., and Richardson, G.B., 1920, The ore deposits of Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 111, 672 p.


Summary:

Pg. 348 (B.S. Butler). The important Jordan and Commercial limestones occur in lower part of Bingham quartzite, and the Highland Bay, Yampa, and other limestones possibly considerably higher.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 189-190).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bingham Quartzite*
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Keroher, G.C., 1966, [Selected U.S. Geologic Names Committee remarks], IN Keroher, G.C., 1966, Lexicon of geologic names of the United States for 1936-1960: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1200, pts. 1-3, 4341 p., (3 volumes)


Summary:

Bingham Quartzite. Includes following units: Phoenix Limestone Lentil, Tilden Limestone Lentil, Yampa Limestone Lentil, Highland Boy Limestone Member, Commercial Limestone Member, Jordan Limestone Member, Lenox Limestone Member, and Butterfield Limestone Member. Present in Bingham district, north-central Utah. Age is Pennsylvanian.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 345).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bingham Quartzite†
  • Modifications:
    • Abandoned
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Great Basin province
Publication:

Tooker, E.W., and Roberts, R.J., 1970, Upper Paleozoic rocks in the Oquirrh Mountains and Bingham mining district, Utah, with a section on biostratigraphy and correlation by Mackenzie Gordon, Jr., and Helen M. Duncan, IN Geologic studies of the Bingham mining district, Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 629-A, p. A1-A76. [Available online from the USGS PubsWarehouse: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp629A]


Summary:

Pg. A5-A8. †Bingham Quartzite. The Bingham Quartzite of Keith (1905, USGS Prof. Paper 38, p. 33-35, pls. 1, 2) is here considered abandoned. It has not been used for many years; workers have applied name Oquirrh Formation (as defined by Gilluly, 1932) to these rocks. Keith (1905) also designated several prominent limestone lentils and members in the Bingham (ascending): Tilden (Petro) and Phoenix Limestone Lentils, and Butterfield, Lenox, Jordan, Commercial, Highland Boy, and Yampa Limestone Members. These names and others used in the mines to designate important ore-forming horizons are abandoned as formally named units and considered local informal marker beds. However, owing to confusion arising from the fact that the Butterfield Limestone Member of Keith (1905) occurs in the "White Pine" Formation of Welsh and James (1961) but not in the Butterfield Formation, the combined unit is here included in the Butterfield Peaks Formation (new) of the Oquirrh Group (fig. 5, section 7).

Source: Publication; Changes in stratigraphic nomenclature, 1970 (USGS Bull. 1354-A, p. A4-A5).


Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).