U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Bend
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bend formation
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Klamath Mountains province
Publication:

Fairbanks, H.W., 1894, Notes on some localities of Mesozoic and Paleozoic in Shasta County, California: American Geologist, v. 14, p. 25-31.


Summary:

Pg. 27. Bend formation, consisting of slates and argillaceous limestone, embraces, as far as is known, the Early and Middle Jurassic.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 381).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bend formation
  • Modifications:
    • Age modified
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Klamath Mountains province
Publication:

Smith, J.P., 1894, The metamorphic series of Shasta County, California: Journal of Geology, v. 2, p. 588-612.


Summary:

Pg. 611. Bend formation was named by J.S. Diller (prelim. proof-edition of USGS Lassen Peak folio, 1892) to include all Jurassic deposits of region of Big Bend of Pitt [Pit] River. In a later publication Mr. Diller (GSA Bull., v. 4, 1893, p. 221) stated that Pitt [Pit] River Jura corresponds to Mormon sandstone (Middle Jura) of Taylorsville region. About 6 miles west of Big Bend, in Big Canyon, H.W. Fairbanks [1893] discovered fossils, in shaly limestones, which, on examination by writer, proved to be Jurassic and probably = Hardgrave sandstone (Lower Jura) of Indian Valley.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 381).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bend formation*
  • Modifications:
    • Principal reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Slate
    • Sandstone
    • Conglomerate
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Klamath Mountains province
Publication:

Diller, J.S., 1895, Lassen Peak folio, California: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Atlas of the United States Folio, GF-15, 4 p., scale 1:250,000


Summary:

(and 1892 prelim. proof-sheet ed. of USGS Lassen Peak folio). The Bend formation contains some limestone, but is composed chiefly of slates, sandstones, and conglomerates, and crops out along western arm of Great Bend of Pit River, Gold Belt region [Shasta County], northern California. Isolated areas of the limestone are exposed near stage road 1 mile west of Montgomery Creek, and the slates and sandstones form upper part of north slope of Cedar Creek 4 miles west of Round Mountain. Jurassic fossils. Rests on Cedar formation and is overlain by Chico formation.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 381); supplemental information from GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bend formation†
  • Modifications:
    • Abandoned
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Klamath Mountains province

Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Bend formation†
  • Modifications:
    • Abandoned
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Klamath Mountains province
Publication:

Imlay, R.W., 1952, Correlation of the Jurassic formations of North America, exclusive of Canada: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 63, no. 9, p. 953-992.


Summary:

Pg. 976. "The term 'Bend formation' was applied to the Jurassic sequence in the Lassen quadrangle (Diller, 1895, p. 4) but was later abandoned, because of prior usage, in favor of Potem formation."

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 298); GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Menlo GNULEX).


Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).