U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Aspermont dolomite
  • Modifications:
    • Original reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Dolomite
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Permian basin
Publication:

Wrather, W.E., 1917, Notes on the Texas Permian: Southwestern Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin [now American Association of Petroleum Geologists], v. 1, p. 93-106.


Summary:

Sec. opp. p. 96 (pl.). Aspermont dolomite. 1 foot thick, lies 105+/- feet below top of Greer formation. [Age is Permian.]
[Probably named from Aspermont, Stonewall Co., central northern TX.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 83).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Aspermont dolomite
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Palo Duro basin
    • Permian basin
Publication:

Cheney, M.G., 1929, Stratigraphic and structural studies in north-central Texas: University of Texas Bulletin, no. 2913, 29 p.


Summary:

Pl. 1. Aspermont dolomite is older than Royston formation and younger than McCaulley dolomite; all included in Double Mountain group. [Age is Permian.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 83).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Aspermont dolomite
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Palo Duro basin
    • Permian basin
Publication:

Norton, G.H., 1929, [Discussion], IN Lloyd, A.M., and Thompson, W.C., Correlation of Permian Outcrops on eastern side of the West Texas basin: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 13, no. 8, p. 954-956. [Available online, with subscription, from AAPG archives: http://www.aapg.org/datasystems or http://search.datapages.com]


Summary:

Pg. 955-956. Aspermont dolomite. Some geologists correlate Guthrie dolomite with the Aspermont dolomite; others believe Guthrie is older than Aspermont. [Age is Permian.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 83).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Aspermont dolomite†
  • Modifications:
    • Abandoned
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Palo Duro basin
    • Permian basin
Publication:

Sellards, E.H., 1933, The pre-Paleozoic and Paleozoic systems in Texas, Part 1, IN Sellards, E.H., Adkins, W.S., and Plummer, F.B, The geology of Texas; Volume 1, Stratigraphy: University of Texas Bulletin, no. 3232, p. 15-238., Published July, 1933


Summary:

Pg. 168. Aspermont dolomite is same as Guthrie dolomite and is discarded, Guthrie having been more commonly used. It is in Blaine formation.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 83).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Aspermont member
  • Modifications:
    • Areal extent
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Palo Duro basin
Publication:

Clifton, R.L., 1942, Invertebrate faunas from the Blaine and the Dog Creek formations of the Permian Leonard series: Journal of Paleontology, v. 16, no. 6, p. 685-699.


Summary:

Pg. 686, 697. Aspermont member, middle member of Dog Creek formation. Shown on chart as underlying unnamed shales and gypsums below Childress member and overlying shales above Guthrie member. Noted as occurring in Harmon County, Oklahoma. [Age is Permian.]

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 1200, p. 155).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Aspermont Dolomite [unranked]
  • Modifications:
    • Mapped 1:250k
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Dolomite
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Palo Duro basin
    • Permian basin

Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).