U.S. Geological Survey Home AASG Logo USGS HOME CONTACT USGS SEARCH USGS
National Geologic Map Database
Geologic Unit: Alger
Search archives
Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Alger formation
  • Modifications:
    • Overview
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Appalachian basin

Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Alger formation
  • Modifications:
    • Principal reference
  • Dominant lithology:
    • Clay
    • Shale
    • Limestone
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Appalachian basin
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Foerste, A.F., 1906, The Silurian, Devonian, and Irvine formations of east-central Kentucky, with an account of their clays and limestones: Kentucky Geological Survey Bulletin, no. 7, 369 p.


Summary:

Pg. 27, 61; also 1905, Kentucky Geol. Survey Bull., no. 6, p. 145. Alger formation. Upper formation of Crab Orchard division (lower part of Niagaran division) of east-central Kentucky. Essentially clay. Includes the following members: Estill clay at top, Waco limestone in middle, and Lulbegrud clay at base; also Flades clay, the equivalent of Estill clay and Waco limestone. Overlain unconformably by Devonian limestone and underlain by Indian Fields formation of Crab Orchard division.
Named from Alger Station on the Louisville and Atlantic RR, between Panola and Irvine, about 1 mi east of Estill-Madison Co. line, KY.

Source: US geologic names lexicon (USGS Bull. 896, p. 30-31).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Alger formation
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
    • Areal extent
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Stout, Wilber, 1941, Dolomites and limestones of western Ohio: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Bulletin, 4th series, no. 42, 468 p.


Summary:

Alger formation extended into southwestern Ohio and subdivided into (ascending) Osgood, Laurel, and Missie members. Average thickness about 55 feet.

Source: Modified from GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Alger Formation
  • Modifications:
    • Not used
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

Rexroad, C.B., Branson, E.R., Smith, M.O., Summerson, C.H., and Boucot, A.J., 1965, The Silurian formations of east-central Kentucky and adjacent Ohio: Kentucky Geological Survey Bulletin, 10th series, no. 2, 34 p., Prepared in cooperation with Indiana Geol. Survey


Summary:

Foerste included Lulbegrud Clay, Waco Limestone, and Estill Clay in Alger Formation. Foerste (1906) in discussing Crab Orchard division, stated that purpose of his grouping was to indicate stratigraphic equivalency of Silurian strata of Kentucky with corresponding strata in Ohio and that lithologically the grouping was not a natural one. Present report places the Lulbegrud and Waco units in Noland Formation (new) and considers Estill Shale of formation rank in Crab Orchard Group. Name Estill Shale should replace name Alger in Ohio. Name Alger serves no useful purpose in Kentucky.

Source: Modified from GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Map showing publication footprint
  • Usage in publication:
    • Alger Shale*
  • Modifications:
    • Revised
  • AAPG geologic province:
    • Cincinnati arch
Publication:

McDowell, R.C., 1983, Stratigraphy of the Silurian outcrop belt on the east side of the Cincinnati arch in Kentucky, with revisions in the nomenclature, IN Contributions to the geology of Kentucky: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1151-F, p. F1-F27. [Available online from the USGS PubsWarehouse: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp1151F]


Summary:

Designated Alger Shale of Crab Orchard Group. Divided into (ascending) Lulbegrud Shale Member, Waco Member, and Estill Shale Member. Lulbegrud primarily clay shale; Waco is dolomite and interbedded clay shale; Estill is primarily clay shale. Recognized in Bath County, Kentucky, and southward into east-central Kentucky. Overlies Drowning Creek Formation; unconformably underlies Devonian rocks.

Source: Modified from GNU records (USGS DDS-6; Reston GNULEX).


Search archives

For more information, please contact Nancy Stamm, Geologic Names Committee Secretary.

Asterisk (*) indicates published by U.S. Geological Survey authors.

"No current usage" (†) implies that a name has been abandoned or has fallen into disuse. Former usage and, if known, replacement name given in parentheses ( ).

Slash (/) indicates name conflicts with nomenclatural guidelines (CSN, 1933; ACSN, 1961, 1970; NACSN, 1983, 2005, 2021). May be explained within brackets ([ ]).