A comment by Larry Freeman about
The Geologic Map Data Model is new to me and I am currently mapping out the data structure. It is part of an effort to create a GIS database system for the AKDGGS. The Geologic Map data model is a part of the project. The remainder will include field data system, a bibliographic data system, an active fault database, a volcano database and so on. Each of the components will include reference to geographic objects, and will thus provide objects and information to or derive objects from the Geologic Map Data Model. The Geologic Map Data Model could play a central role to our data system. Before I put a lot of time and energy into putting the data model to work I would like to hear the experience of other state or provincial surveys that have implemented or are implementing the data model. What has worked for your survey? What as not worked? Is the data model turning your geologic maps into visualizations? Has it been a nightmare? Is the data model meshing with cartography so that publication of paper maps is not disrupted? At present we have a GIS system that works as a cartographic tool, there is little true analysis actually being done. But since we are a project and publication oriented agency we need to get the publications out to the public. We can't have the implementation of a data model disrupt the flow of cartographic products or there will be distrust of the data model as a viable tool.
Further discussion of Implementation of the Data Model (this page):
(No comments about this document have been posted.)